Chicago Streetscene: Patterns

click images for larger view

Mind in the Gutta: Lichtenstein's Entablatures

click images for larger view

As you move through the foyer of the Art Institute's essential exhibition  Roy Lichenstein: A Retrospective, you will see, on the walls on either side of you one of the artist's series of Entablatures.

Just coming off his series of Mirror paintings, Lichtenstein began a study of entablatures, in classical architecture the intermediate bands that separate the columns from the pediment.  The artist looked at examples in ancient buildings he found in architectural journals, and then he took the streets around his lower Manhattan studio, taking photographs at noontime, when the high light brought out the features of the ornament in sharpest detail.  The buildings he photographed were, of course, far from ancient, but contemporary, buildings that appropriated the classical idiom to link the architecture of power in ancient times to the architecture of power in modern times - the banks and financial institutions of the Wall Street district.  Copies of copies of copies, much in the same way that Lichtenstein drew on existing images for his own work.

Entablature #8, 1972, 30 x 240 inches

In the words of art historian Barbara Rose, Entablatures are "like the comic strip in that they are reductive, symbolic and diagrammatic images closer to the world of abstract signs than to that of representational imagery.”  Although each of the Entablatures are of finite size, the standardized, repetitive patterns seem infinitely extrudable, each extension like another Warhol Campbells Soup can or Brillo box.

Entablature 1975, 54 x 216 inches

In his essay in the excellent catalogue for the exhibition, Two Birds With One Stone, Yve-Alain Bois relates that shortly his death, the artist was asked if he had ever produced art without an element of humor . . .

We'll I'm trying to think.  Even the Entablatures are meant to be humorous in a way, because they don't seem to be funny but they mean imperial power or something like that.  That's the work I can think of that's maybe the most humorless, but it's still meant to be humorous in some way.

There were 30 paintings in two series.  The first, from 1971-72, were black-and-white.  The second, 1974-76, in color and using textures.   As Bois notes, the series could be seen to be prophetic.  In 1972, Robert Venturi and Denise Scott Brown's Learning from Las Vegas was published, and Post-Modernism in architecture, which Bois disdains, was off to the races.  But the time Post-Modernism was in full flower a few years later, Lichtenstein had already moved on to somewhere else.

"This series," said Lichtenstein, "can also to seen to represent, in a humorous way, the establishment."
Now Lichtenstein is the establishment, entombed, for the moment, in Thomas Beeby's neo-classical Daniel F. and Ada L. Rice Building, from 1988, with its Doric-columned courtyard.

And yet Lichtenstein rebels.  The amazing color of his canvases burst out of the Rice monochrome, like the vanished applied color of ancient Greek temples that classicists like Beeby always leave out of their contemporary re-imaginings.

We first wrote about Roy Lichtenstein: A Retrospective, all the way back in June, in Lichtenstein Express, about a building-sized Lichtenstein mural created by School of the Art Institute students on the sides of a former warehouse facing the Kennedy expressway.

Tempus Fugit.  We are now fast closing in on the September 3rd closing date for this remarkable show.  For its final four days over the Labor Day weekend, the Art Institute is extending its hours through 8:00 p.m.

If you the only thing you thought about Lichtenstein was that he was the guy who did comic book stuff, you're in for a delightful shock.  While early critics honed on his work as being all the same, what strikes you at the Art Institute is how Lichtenstein took a basic idiom, and stretched and re-invented it in multiple directions throughout his career.  His final canvases included both a series of nudes . . .

Interior with Nude Leaving, 1997

and Japanese-inspired landscapes . . .

Landscape in Fog, 1996

 Confronted with heroic canvasses, like Lichtenstein's take on  Laocoön . . .

Laocoön, 1988

. . . you might be tempted to pass up the long gallery filled with mostly small things, works on paper.

Don't.  Here you'll find the studies that are not only superb works of art in themselves, but testimony to Lichtenstein's craftsmanship.  You can even see his penciled notes and color studies for his Haystack and Haystacks consideration of the same-named paintings of Monet.

The Red Horseman (Study), 1974

Most considerations I've read of Lichtenstein's work downplay the significance of content.  Since the images are appropriated, they're seen as almost incidental, a road to the craft of the finished pieces.  Yet while how he chose to make things as an artist may be the key to Lichtenstein's importance as an artist, what he chose to see is, at least to me, no less compelling, and the overall impression of Roy Lichtenstein: A Retrospective is of an exceptionally capacious mind, an unsentimentally optimistic character, and a body of work that is a bracing counterpoint to the often self-absorbed fatalism of  much of the art of our time.

After Chicago, the show barnstorms to the National Gallery in DC, the Tate in London, and the Pompidou in Paris.  You have another 15 days to see if here.  Why wait? 

Planes and Towers, Spectated

click images for larger view (recommended)

 

 

 

the drama of this shot is via auto adjust, but it looks so good I couldn't resist.

Air and Water Show!

click images for larger view

Chicago Air and Water Show 2012, Saturday and Sunday, August 18 and 19, 10:00 a.m - 3:00 p.m., North Avenue Beach.

See a photo portrait of Friday's rehearsal after the break.

 

Northwestern, Grow Up: Refuting Northwestern's desperate PR campaign to Destroy Prentice.

click images for larger view

Northwestern - the hospital and university - is getting desperate. Faced with growing international opposition from architects, historians and activists to Northwestern's plan to demolish Bertrand Goldberg's iconic Prentice Hospital building, they're mounting a full-press PR effort whose basic tenets are so transparently absurd that they stand only to make Northwestern look brazenly cynical and ridiculous at the same time.

And so we have the op-ed in Crain's Chicago Business by Dean of the Feinberg School of Medicine Eric Neilson in which he contends with what looks to be a straight face that thousands of jobs, hundreds of millions of dollars - no make it $1.5 billion - will all vanish into thin air, and, apparently, thousands will die, if Northwestern isn't allowed to destroy Prentice.    It's like tax cuts for rich in Republican politics.  Demolishing Prentice has become the answer to every problem, the fulcrum on which the entire future of the Northwestern campus rests in the balance between a glorious future and complete disintegration.

This isn't an argument; it's a tantrum.  It's pretty much on the level of threatening to hold your breath until you die unless you get more bubble gum -and then won't you all be sorry.

And then, of course, there's the Chicago Tribune.  On August 12th, with its Pulitzer Prize winning architecture critic Blair Kamin safely packed away to a Nieman fellowing at Harvard, the Trib ran an editorial under the typically pompous headline, Let Northwestern build, shilling for the destruction of the building Kamin has called a "boldly sculptural, brilliantly engineered high-rise"

Chicago Tribune urban planning at work
Hedrich Blessing photography, courtesy the Chuckman Collection

It was full of the usual half-truths and evasions, which is what you expect from those wonderful people who gave you McCormick Place on what should of remained open lakefront.  It was the Tribune we have to thank for what was essentially a vanity project of the paper's isolationist, red-baiting, labor-hating editor Robert R. McCormick, who dispatched political reporter George Tagge to Springfield to lobby legislators to rubber-stamp the project.  Although the original eyesore mercifully burned down in the 1960's, it's much better successor by Gene Summers still crowds what today would have been open lakefront, for all the people.

Thanks, Chicago Tribune.  Please don't hold it against us if we don't have much use for your new "gift" of destroying Prentice.

Northwestern would like you to not notice the letter to Mayor Emanuel supporting saving Prentice from 60 major architects from all across the world.  Frank Gehry?  Jeanne Gang? Who are they?  What trees to they plant?  What bankers do they have on retainer?

Enter Paul Beitler.  He isn't some building-hugging goo-goo, but one of Chicago's successful developers.  In a conversation with Crain Chicago's's Business Shia Kapos, he says, in Kapos' words, that "he's had enough of the 'out with the old' mentality."  Beitler calls Northwestern's bluff. "There are a lot of things in nature that don't fit, but we find ways to work around them and with them.  This building is so unusual that regardless of the its designer it deserves to stand the test of time. If allowed to remain it will be the only building that stands out from the blocks of architectural mediocrity . . . "  You can't kid a kidder, and Beitler isn't buying Northwestern's protests that they have alternative to destroying Prentice.  He's been in the business and done enough deals to know that's pure B.S.

Today, the Save Prentice Coalition issued an eloquent refutation of Northwestern's arguments.  Read the full text after the break.

Speaking from someone who saw its excellence first-hand when I was in the emergency room a couple weeks ago, Northwestern Hospital is one of Chicago's great institutions.  Why is it dealing with the issue of Prentice like the really bad doctor who patronizes his patients with baby talk?

Northwestern, grow up.  

Stop insulting our intelligence with your puerile arguments and false alternatives.   Prentice doesn't work for you?  Fine.  There are a lot of developers for whom it would work out just fine.  There are other places to build your state-of-the-art laboratory.  You already have a lot bridges.  Make more, longer if you have to.  As Paul Beitler says, Prentice is the only distinctive building in a sea of architectural mediocrity that demeans your brand.  Don't destroy it.  Use it in building that brand.  There are a lot of people who want to help.  Let them.

Don't be deluded in thinking that once you destroy Prentice, it will be forgotten.  As the legacy of Bertrand Goldberg's work grows in time - and it will - Northwestern, whatever else its achievements, will be forever known that as the vandal that destroyed a key piece of Chicago's cultural legacy.

You're better than that.  You're all about healing, and healing is about a lot more than what goes on in surgery.  Your campus is a forbidding, unwelcoming physical presence.   It misrepresents you as a mere repository of great corporate power.

Make your campus human scaled. Heal it, as you continue to build.  Start by agreeing to find an alternative that saves Prentice, perhaps the only place on campus where the soaring grace truly expresses the aspirations of your mission.   With just a portion of the same brilliant thinking you bring to the practice and teaching of medicine, you can find a solution to saving Prentice that will let you do everything you want, while making you a true hero in the definition of Chicago's character, past, present and future.


Read the Save Prentice press release after the break.



TO: Chicago Reporters
FROM: Save Prentice Coalition
RE: Northwestern’s New Public Relations Campaign

This week, Northwestern University started making some big promises to Chicago. On
Monday, August 13 in response to pressure from the preservation community, they
launched the “Finding Tomorrow’s Cures” campaign to convince Chicagoans that jobs,
investment, and cures for diseases are on the horizon but can only be realized by
building on the site of the historic Prentice Women’s Hospital at 333 E. Superior Street
in Streeterville.

Here are three things to know about their new campaign:

Northwestern Is Offering A False Choice

• Northwestern wants us to believe that Chicago needs to choose between
saving lives and saving Prentice, but it is a false choice. We can and
should do both.

• None of the benefits Northwestern promises are tied to placing their new
research facility on the site of the historic Prentice Women’s Hospital.
• In fact, the intimately intertwined partners of the McGraw Medical Center

consortium – including Northwestern University and Northwestern
Memorial Hospital – could designate an alternate site to build a medical
research facility and invest in the reuse of Prentice for other institutional or
commercial needs. This would deliver all of the same benefits
Northwestern promises – and create even more jobs and economic activity.

Northwestern Still Doesn’t Have A Plan for the Prentice Site

• Northwestern wants us to believe that there is an urgent need to demolish
historic Prentice Women’s Hospital, but construction isn’t scheduled to
start until 2015. This provides more than two years to find a solution that
builds for our future while preserving our past.

• The only specific fact Northwestern provides about the initial construction
is that it will be “300,000 to 500,000 square feet.” There are no land-use
plans, renderings, massing studies, environmental impact analyses, traffic
and parking studies, financing plans, etc.

 Northwestern Isn’t Living Up To The Standards It Sets For Others 

• As part of their campaign, Northwestern is calling on the city to
demonstrate leadership and a commitment to innovation. Meanwhile, their
campaign is designed to convince Chicagoans that finding a reuse for
historic Prentice and an alternate site for research is simply not feasible.

 • However, just across the street sits a massive vacant lot owned by
Northwestern University’s long-term strategic partner Northwestern
Memorial HealthCare. These two institutions have a long history of
cooperating on development in Streeterville, millions of dollars in shared
real estate and facility leases, and a joint strategic plan that includes
investment in facilities and infrastructure among its objectives.

 • Northwestern has more than enough resources to find a solution. What
they are lacking is will and creativity. As Northwestern University
spokesperson Al Cubbage recently stated when asked how they would
fund a new building, "We have the money. There's no question about that.
Northwestern University has an endowment of $7 billion. That's billion with
a b."

Facebook - Ad money , Add money !!!!

How to become a reseller in the world of social media marketing, like Face-book, etc. This is a very great opportunity to earn from Face-book . There are many applications that are available . But some work and some don't.

12 Month License to Our Exclusive Fan Reviews Facebook App.

What you get?

•  How to create and set up a Facebook page correctly
•  Simple steps to optimize your Facebook page and start getting "likes"
•  5 biggest mistakes being made on social media and how to avoid them
• How to manage your social media in less than 5 minutes per day

How to prevent someone from hacking your Facebook password

Face-book now-a-days has become more and more popular. Its popularity has made millions of businessmen earn profits and advertise on the face-book as they know there is sure profits here.

What everyone wants if he or she is a businessman , is more and more viewers and more and more profits from that. The viewers then change to likes and likes may convert into buying the product on face-book. This goes on and hence there is a possibility of anyone hacking the profile or id or password, whatever. Think of how to keep it secured and not to be available to anyone on net.

• Remove anything that is not correct. This could mean wall posts, images, or status's.
• If anyone harasses you on Facebook Chat, then go offline.
• If anyone is continuously harassing you, messaging you that is inappropriate , you can remove them off your friend list . Just block them.
• Never add any friend requests that you do not know, 
• Don't display your year of birth. It slightly helps improve security settings and prevent identity theft.
• If you see any inappropriate images or comments then e-mail Facebook at abuse@Facebook.com.
• If your child is on Facebook and are under 13, monitor them weekly to see whats happening and make sure your child has all the safety equipment on.

How to find who deleted/Unfriended you on facebook?